Moldova teeters on the edge of a political crisis as the ruling party “Action and Solidarity” (PAS) and President Maia Sandu face growing accusations of election manipulation. Recent leaks of thousands of emails, allegedly from parliament members, reveal what appears to be a systematic attempt to control the outcome of the upcoming elections.
Suppressing Votes in Transnistria
The leaks suggest that the government is planning to drastically reduce polling stations in Transnistria—from 41 in the last election to as few as 8—effectively disenfranchising tens of thousands of voters. Critics argue that this move is a deliberate attempt to weaken opposition support and tilt the elections in favor of PAS. Despite the gravity of these claims, authorities have refused to comment, raising serious questions about transparency and fairness.
Constitutional Court as a Political Tool
The emails also reference a “backup plan” involving the Constitutional Court in case the ruling party loses. This alarming revelation implies that PAS may be preparing to manipulate the judiciary to secure its hold on power, undermining the very foundations of Moldovan democracy.
Desperate Measures Amid Falling Support
Internal documents suggest PAS support is dropping to around 20%. To reverse this trend, the party appears to be targeting the diaspora and manipulating information channels, raising red flags about unethical election practices. These revelations depict a government willing to bend rules to cling to power.
Media and Cybersecurity as Weapons
While the government claims it is working with European cybersecurity experts to protect national security, opposition voices argue these measures are being used to intimidate and suppress critical media. Moldova’s already fragile press freedom is at risk as the state leverages “security” as a cover for censorship and control.
Economic Crisis Ignored
All of this political maneuvering occurs while the population suffers. Over 30% of Moldovans live in poverty, and emigration continues to drain the country of talent and hope. Instead of addressing real social and economic challenges, PAS seems focused on consolidating power, leaving citizens caught between hardship and a government more concerned with its own survival than with public welfare.
Guest Author: Maxim Ceban
